Need to know basis
Last night I found myself battling the hair gel mocking winds at Trafalgar Square en route to a talk at the ICA by Zadie Smith and Philip Gourevitch, as you do. Or rather, as you do when at week 3 into your cultural detox, you start to dream yourself a born-again scholar. That is, until you get into a room of 200 Kafka lovers to celebrate the book launch of the Paris Review Interviews (a collection of interviews with the world's great contemporary authors) and realise that your writings are tragically closer to this than that.
And without getting into any feverish displays of jealousy and pseudo-academic posturings, I will say the most interesting part of the evening was hearing about all the writer's little obsessions and jokes, rather than their more prescriptive or portentous moments. Like how Dorothy Parker writes two-fingered on a typewriter. Capote writes prone on a sofa or bed, smoking and drinking coffee, mint tea, then sherry and martinis. Joan Didion goes back to page one and re-types everything ("It gets me into a rhythm"). Hemingway, pompous and fetishistic, writes in the bedroom of his Havana house standing "on the worn skin of the lesser kudu", on onion-skin paper, noting his daily progress on charts.
Thankfully sanity is restored by Bellow, who refuses to discuss his work habits because "for the artist to give such loving attention to his own shoelaces [is] dangerous, even immoral". Which is precisely why you don't need to know exactly how much wine I am drinking right now, or ever. That would be dangerous, even immoral.
Paris Review Interviews, 1.
£9.89 on Amazon
And without getting into any feverish displays of jealousy and pseudo-academic posturings, I will say the most interesting part of the evening was hearing about all the writer's little obsessions and jokes, rather than their more prescriptive or portentous moments. Like how Dorothy Parker writes two-fingered on a typewriter. Capote writes prone on a sofa or bed, smoking and drinking coffee, mint tea, then sherry and martinis. Joan Didion goes back to page one and re-types everything ("It gets me into a rhythm"). Hemingway, pompous and fetishistic, writes in the bedroom of his Havana house standing "on the worn skin of the lesser kudu", on onion-skin paper, noting his daily progress on charts.
Thankfully sanity is restored by Bellow, who refuses to discuss his work habits because "for the artist to give such loving attention to his own shoelaces [is] dangerous, even immoral". Which is precisely why you don't need to know exactly how much wine I am drinking right now, or ever. That would be dangerous, even immoral.
Paris Review Interviews, 1.
£9.89 on Amazon
10 Comments:
Love Zadie Smith, Love Paris Review, Love CS--find a link!
Great blog. Never thought of Hemingway as writing that way. Stay real CS!
Wow - what an amazing insight about Joan Didion. :-)
Zadie Smith is the most over-rated media product to come out of London's literary world in years. Don't believe the hype. On Beauty was only superceded in arrogance by Autograph Man.
I read On Beauty by Zadie Smith a couple weeks ago, and I found it enormously overrated. the characters were all one-dimensional stereotypes spouting shallow charicatures of political ideas. the plot was so melodramatic and contrived that it failed to wrap up ANY of the threads it supported, and barely even developed any of its multiple, multiple sub-plotlets. Every phrase, it frequently seemed, was so hyper-aware and self-conscious, it attempted to impede real development at any chance. It's basically a totally UN-modern story trying so hard to be "post-modern" (I intentionally use quote marks to imply that it is merely a sense of fashion and style, as opposed to actually addressing the concept of literature or prose), it steps on its own feet. The worst thing is that it's a great rough draft. There's some great writing hidden in there at various points. It's completely masturbatory. The Guardian can take their house-wife novels and stuff them up my puckered ass!
Re; Paris Review Interviews - fascinating reading for anyone interested in writing. Good tip CS!
But why do we read author interviews? Isn't it enough that a writer has told a story well, moving us or making us laugh? Must we also go snooping into his private life, interrogating him, picking over his "stuff," as Julian Barnes once put it? A great many writers, though they enjoy the interview attention, deplore the inquiry into their routines and habits, the reduction (as they see it) of their work to a mere corollary of their personal story.
Great post as ever CS. But the insanity that is that link to Posh's 'blog.' How low can we go?
Hi
tramadol
buy tramadol
buy tramadol
This comment has been removed by the author.
Post a Comment
<< Home